Other[ edit ] "I think anyone who buys a t-shirt of Che has gotta be cool. If I see someone with a Che t-shirt, I think, 'He's got good taste'. Thompson awakens from an adrenochrome overdose and stands in front of a picture of Che Guevara stuck to a Mexican flag. Benicio del Toro who co starred in the film and would later play Che Guevara in Chehas stated that Thompson kept a "big" picture of Che in his kitchen.
There were indications, however, that this initial hostility moderated in the following period. First, virtually every interlocutor stressed the need to appreciate the context of military occupation in terms of killings in Israel and Iraq.
For some, this context was everything: International humanitarian law, however, obliges all parties to an armed conflict to respect civilian immunity, including in resisting military occupation.
On this point, there is no discernible difference between Islamists or Islamic leaders, on the one hand, and secularists and leftists, on the other.
This Palestine exceptionalism takes several forms. Neither of these rationales can justify targeting civilians. They indicated interest in being part of a public service campaign to promote awareness of this humanitarian principle, its history, and what it means in the Palestinian context—although they were emphatically not proposing to initiate such an Photo essay laurent nkunda.
This vulnerability is even more pronounced in nearby countries where solidarity with Palestinians has taken on a doctrinaire quality, notably Egypt and Jordan. We need a package solution. In our environment I or others can easily be isolated as a traitor or agent. We need to emphasize abuses by the superior power.
Human Rights Watch, they said, criticizes Israeli violations, to be sure, but in their view the language tends to be more restrained than when discussing Palestinian violations. At present, he said, Israel left Palestinians with few options. Much will hinge on whether and to what extent the international community uses this opportunity to promote respect for international humanitarian law principles by addressing the important element of accountability.
As discussed below, the laws of war prohibition against targeting civilians is absolute, and does not rest on compliance by an adversary.
Their focus is on abuses committed by their own governments, which are all too ready to pounce on any opportunity to discredit these groups.
Those governments and their cronies dominate the media. If the Tunisian media were free, a group like the League might be able to fight back, but it is not.
In this situation, these organizations are protective of their credibility and carefully monitor their political capital so that they can continue to monitor abuses by their own governments, and they would find the risks too high in coming out with statements criticizing Hamas or other Palestinian groups.
Our meetings also involved conversations with groups perpetrating violations. Members of groups that have carried out attacks against Israeli civilians knew basic IHL standards and claimed to have no quarrel with them.
The groups are familiar with the prohibition against indiscriminate attacks or those that target civilians, but they made clear that they were willing to spare civilians only to the extent that their adversary—Israel—did so as well. But in the same conversation, this spokesman acknowledged that Hezbollah did carry out such attacks as reprisals for Israeli attacks that killed Lebanese civilians.
Under IHL, a belligerent reprisal is an otherwise unlawful action permitted in exceptional circumstances as an enforcement measure against unlawful acts by an adversary. Reprisals against civilians are broadly if not universally condemned by states.
As a matter of customary IHL, reprisals are never permitted in non-international armed conflicts—those not between states.
Islamic teachings support the Geneva Conventions. His comments demonstrated that the policy of reprisal went hand in hand with a tendency to erase the operative distinctions between civilian and combatant in the case of Israel: Myths and Realities of Islamist Motivation Few of those we have met with to discuss these issues, including Islamists and Islamic scholars or representatives of Islamist groups that have been responsible for targeting civilians, suggested that Islamic law differed significantly from international humanitarian law when it comes to prohibiting attacks on civilians.
Typical was the comment of an Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood leader.
But we encountered little or no effort on the part of our interlocutors, even those who were Islamist activists or religious leaders, to justify violations of the principle of civilian immunity from attack on grounds that such attacks are permitted, or not prohibited, under Islamic law.
Most of the scholars in our Islamic nations have ruled that it is permissible and, indeed, one of the best forms of jihad and resistance. The role of Islamic doctrine and Islamist ideology is much more pronounced in the other main category of movements that have taken up arms and employed violence against ordinary people as well as agents of the state, namely political movements that aim to overthrow or radically alter an existing government that itself claims Islamic legitimacy.
Muslim polities, like others, do not look kindly on armed insurgencies and would-be usurpers, and this resistance to rebellion is encoded in the opposition to fitna, or disorder. In Islamic terms, it is essential for a rebel or insurgent movement to make a credible claim that the government in question is not, and in some versions never was, genuine 40 WORLD REPORT ly or sufficiently Islamic in its practices, or has betrayed Islam in some serious manner.
In the eyes of the insurgents, such governments are no longer Muslim and must be fought as apostates and non-believers kufar.
This can be self-evident where the ruling party is foreign and non-Muslim. With regard to existing Arab governments, rebels and insurgents justify in Islamic terms their recourse to armed violence by declaring the leaders of the state in question, and those who support those leaders, to be kufar.
Some, with impeccable militant credentials, have condemned such attacks in no uncertain terms.Love Nkunda. Photography and Illustration. Arte Pop, Photo Collage Design, Pop Art Collage, Face Collage, Collage Artwork, Photo Art, Pop Magazine, Magazine Collage, Pop Art Design Arte Digital Collage Portrait Face Collage Collage Art Collage Drawing Abstract Portrait Art Plastique A Level Art Final Piece Essay Competition.
New York, June 26, —Five Malian journalists who covered a high school essay assignment—and the teacher who commissioned the lesson—were convicted today of insulting President Amadou Toumani Toure, according to news reports and local journalists.
Eddy Isanuo & Todd Pitman, Rwanda troops arrest powerful Congo rebel leader: Some fear the deal could backfire & bring more turmoil to the region, [Arrested Man: Laurent Nkunda, Democratic Republic of the Congo], Associated Press ©Jan 24, In contrast, the rebel leader Laurent Nkunda was “accused of committing atrocities” and ordained the bad guy by the BBC.
Kabila, who represented western interests, was clearly the good guy – just like Nato in the Balkans and Israel in the Middle East.
The new president of the Democratic Republic of Congo (former Zaire) Laurent Kabila, however, was not friendly to UNITA, while the MPLA government seemed bent on . In the eastern mountains of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DR Congo), a rebel army led by Laurent Nkunda - a former General of the DR Congo armed forces - recently launched attacks and captured.