See Article History At the end of the 19th and the start of the 20th centuries, when William Shakespeare was becoming an academic institution, so to speak—a subject for serious scholarly study—a revolutionary search began in the world outside the universities for the means to present his great dramas in the new medium of film. Among these early films was a remarkable production of still available by the London studio of the British Mutoscope and Biograph Company: Like all silent films, the scene from King John might well have been accompanied by some variation of live music, sound effects, phonograph records, intertitles, recitations, or supplementary lectures, as filmmakers sought to compensate for a silenced Shakespeare. Professor Mark Thornton Burnett explaining why people should not be dissuaded from watching translations of Shakespeare's works, because though he wrote exclusively in English, the stories, conflicts, and emotions are retained across cultures.
While the actual stage scenery is held quite simplistic, the lush costumes bring everything to life.
This is due to the wonderful delivery of the actors, whether that is through song or spoken word. The live performed music adds to that magic. Pierro Niel-Mee brings the required amount of raw energy, bursting with the ambition to make his mark in the world.
But he also shines in the softer, gentler and comedic moments. Imogen Daines tackled the difficult task of portraying three different characters at once.
They all fall on one note, so it is hard to tell at times who she is playing. But then, we all have to remember how difficult it is to even portray one character. It was considered to be a crime, a shame for women to become an actress. All female roles were only portrayed by men.
A fact we all should remind ourselves of. And that art, theatre and passion can transcend genders, borders and hatred. This is a terrifically uplifting production that transports you to a different time and place and makes you forget the troubles of the modern world for a few hours.If the film Shakespeare In Love was a massive success (including winning Judi Dench an Oscar for an astonishingly short seven minutes of screen time), then it's pleasing to say its myriad charms work even better upon the stage.
This should come as no surprise, Marc Norman and Tom Stoppard's original. Get exclusive film and movie reviews from THR, the leading source of film reviews online. We take an honest look at the best and worst movies Hollywood has to offer. The Guinness Book of Records lists feature-length film and TV versions of William Shakespeare's plays, making Shakespeare the most filmed author ever in any language..
As of July , the Internet Movie Database lists Shakespeare as having writing credit on 1, films, including those under production but not yet released. The earliest known production is King John from Dec 25, · Then the movie stirs in a sweet love story, juicy court intrigue, backstage politics and some lovely moments from "Romeo and Juliet" (Shakespeare's working title: "Romeo and Ethel, the Pirate's Daughter").4/4.
Shakespeare in Love, American-British film, released in , that was a lighthearted and clever imagining of how William Shakespeare’s play Romeo and Juliet came to be written and produced. The movie, which satirizes theatre life and plays with what is known and what is unknown about Shakespeare’s life and times, won the Academy Award and the BAFTA Award for best film as well .
Movie reviews, news and features from critics and reporters of The New York Times.